<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scrum on iniy.org</title><link>https://iniy.org/tags/scrum/</link><description>Recent content in Scrum on iniy.org</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iniy.org/tags/scrum/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>WTF: physical scrum boards</title><link>https://iniy.org/2016/05/wtf-physical-scrum-boards/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://iniy.org/2016/05/wtf-physical-scrum-boards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://iniy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/postit.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://iniy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/postit.png" alt="postit" loading="lazy" decoding="async"&gt;&#10;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;On every scrum project I have the same discussions with the scrum master. Why on earth would we want to use a physical scrum board? I then hear some cultish praises of awesomeness in favour of the physical scrum board and total neglectance of any arguments against it. That goes so far that the scrum masters seems to be experts on office supply brands and field tested ripping-off techniques for post-its. People start writing information (about two words from a 200 word description) from a ticketsystem on a post-it and making photos of the physical scrumboard to re-digitize it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>